Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Legislation’ Category

India is rapidly becoming a major player in the surrogacy business, for better or for worse. Many developed nations have outlawed commercial surrogacy as immoral, or they prohibit it for certain groups (homosexuals or single people). Therefore, individuals and couples seeking to grow their families through surrogacy are often forced to look elsewhere. India is becoming a favored destination for these families, since commercial surrogacy is legal, and a surrogate can be paid what seems a very small sum to the intended parents, but a fortune for the surrogate, thanks to differences in the standard of living and exchange rates.

Much has been made of the fate of the German couple who used an Indian surrogate to bear their twins, only to have the German government deny the children citizenship, and the Indian government do the same. But couples from Australia, France and other parts of Europe are turning to India over the United States for cost savings. Over the next couple of posts, we’re going to cover some of the drawbacks to using a surrogate in India (or anywhere outside the United States) to grow your family.

To whet your appetite, start here: a 60 minutes piece about an Australian couple turning to India for their gestational surrogacy. Watch it and comment below. We’d love to hear your thoughts.

Family Formation Law Offices has been in the family building business for nearly thirty years. Whether you are seeking to build your family through adoption, or third-party assisted reproduction, we have the skills and resources to help you. Call 1-800-877-1880 today for your free 15 minute consultation.

Read Full Post »

Washington State currently has a ban on paid gestational surrogacy arrangements. But that may change very soon. According to the Seattle Times, a bill has passed the State House, 59-39, allowing women to be paid to serve as gestational surrogates.

If it becomes law, the bill debated last Monday would set up a detailed system for entering into surrogacy contracts. The bill is now being considered by Washington State’s Senate.

Under the bill, House Bill 2793, surrogates would have to be at least 21 and have previously given birth to a child. Additional requirements include obtaining medical coverage for the pregnancy and immediately after birth, passing mental and physical examinations, and signing a written consent form. Intended parents also would have to meet certain requirements, including a mental health evaluation and an affidavit from a doctor attesting to a medical need for surrogacy.

Gay and lesbian couples would not need a medical affidavit. The measure also would give state-registered domestic partners access to the Uniform Parentage Act, a law regulating child support and custody.

California intended parents are very lucky, as you can see by this news article. California intended parents have long had the ability to obtain pre-birth judgments declaring them the legal parents of the children. While surrogacy is unregulated in California, there are many excellent programs run by experienced practitioners and attorneys, who can advise you on the best way to create your family. Family Formation Law Offices encourages you to visit our website to learn about using gestational surrogacy to build your family, including the costs, timeframe, and what to expect.

Read Full Post »

On February 19, 2010, Assembly Member Bradford introduced a bill into the California legislature designed to regulate the practice of so called “surrogacy practitioners,” AB 2426. You can track its status here.

Surrogacy practitioners, as defined by the bill, are persons or organizations that engage in either (1) advertising for the purpose of soliciting parties to an assisted reproduction agreement or acting as an intermediary between the parties to an assisted reproduction agreement; or (2) charging a fee or other valuable consideration for services rendered relating to an assisted reproduction arrangement.

We’ve already covered how to choose an assisted reproduction program in some detail on this blog. One of the problems we’ve identified in this field is a lack of regulation. Unfortunately, several surrogacy agencies have closed their doors in recent months, and in so doing, took the money intended parents had placed with them to pay medical bills, the surrogate’s monthly expenses and her compensation. These parents were left with no recourse, since these agencies are not licensed or otherwise regulated by the state. Now, there are a few surrogacy programs run by attorneys, and we strongly recommend that families considering surrogacy work with an attorney owned and operated program, because the attorney has a license on the line, and you, the consumer, have recourse through the State Bar if the attorney commits malpractice.

The other part of the bill regulates how a non-attorney surrogacy practitioner handles client funds. The legislation would require the practitioner to deposit the client funds into either an independent bonded escrow depository, or a trust account maintained by an attorney. It further requires that client funds can only be withdrawn only by agreement between the surrogacy practitioner and the intended legal parent identified in the assisted reproduction arrangement.

This bill has only just been introduced into the legislature, and its going to take some time to work its way through the legislature. It will likely undergo some refinements between now and when its signed into law, whenever that may be. However, Family Formation Law Offices is pleased that the legislature is aware of the problems out there, and at least considering legislation. We will keep you informed of any updates!

Read Full Post »